Meta-analysis of published studies or meta-analysis of individual data? Caesarean section in HIV-positive women as a study case
Public Health, ISSN: 0033-3506, Vol: 117, Issue: 5, Page: 323-328
2003
- 12Citations
- 22Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations12
- Citation Indexes12
- CrossRef12
- 12
- Captures22
- Readers22
- 22
Article Description
Very few comparative evaluations of meta-analysis of published data and meta-analysis using individual patient data have appeared in the medical literature. The association between type of delivery and HIV perinatal transmission appears to be an excellent study case, given the recent publication of the meta-analysis of individual patient data by the International Perinatal HIV Group. In this paper, we report the results of a meta-analysis of the published studies, which show a statistically significant reduction of perinatal HIV transmission rate with Caesarean section. The results are surprisingly similar to those of the recently published meta-analysis of individual patient data, indicating that, in the absence of significant confounding, the two meta-analytic methods are likely to give consistent results. In this era of constrained resources for biomedical research, caution should be taken in abandoning meta-analysis of published data for studying epidemiological associations of public health interest.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0033350603001057; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0033-3506(03)00105-7; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0041919607&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12909421; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0033350603001057; http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0033350603001057; http://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0033350603001057?httpAccept=text/xml; http://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0033350603001057?httpAccept=text/plain; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0033-3506%2803%2900105-7; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0033-3506%2803%2900105-7
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know