Pharmacologic characterization of Botulinum toxin for basic science and medicine
Toxicon, ISSN: 0041-0101, Vol: 35, Issue: 9, Page: 1373-1412
1997
- 65Citations
- 29Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations65
- Citation Indexes59
- 59
- CrossRef54
- Patent Family Citations6
- Patent Families6
- Captures29
- Readers29
- 29
Review Description
The use of Botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) is increasing in both clinical and basic science. Clinically, intramuscular injection of nanogram quantities of BoNT is fast becoming the treatment of choice for a spectrum of disorders including movement disorders such as torticollis, blepharospasm, Meige Disease, and hemifacial spasm (Borodic et al., 1991, 1994a; Jankovic and Brin, 1991; Clarke, 1992). Neuroscientists are using BoNTs as tools to develop a better understanding of the mechanisms underlying the neurotransmitter release process. Consequently, our ability to accurately and reliably quantify the biologic activity of botulinum toxin has become more important than ever. The accurate measurement of the pharmacologic activity of BoNTs has become somewhat problematic with the most significant problems occurring with the clinical use of the toxins. The biologic activity of BoNTs has been measured using a variety of techniques including assessment of whole animal responses to in vitro effects on neurotransmitter release. The purpose of this review is to examine the approaches employed to characterize, quantify and investigate the actions of the BoNTs and to provide a guide to aid investigators in determining which of these methods is most appropriate for their particular application or use.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0041010196001808; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0041-0101(96)00180-8; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0030694576&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9403963; http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0041010196001808; http://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0041010196001808?httpAccept=text/xml; http://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0041010196001808?httpAccept=text/plain; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0041010196001808; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0041-0101%2896%2900180-8; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0041-0101%2896%2900180-8
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know