Striving for balance in decisions on antenatal pharmacotherapy
The Lancet, ISSN: 0140-6736, Vol: 404, Issue: 10464, Page: 1779-1782
2024
- 11Captures
- 3Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures11
- Readers11
- 11
- Mentions3
- News Mentions3
- 3
Most Recent News
HMN 2024: Experts propose an ethics-based, evidence-backed approach
Do you know: Experts propose an ethics-based, evidence-backed approach in 2024 Most women use medication during pregnancy. Yet, selecting appropriate drugs and doses is challenging.
Review Description
Most individuals use medication during pregnancy. However, decision making on antenatal pharmacotherapy presents considerable ethical and scientific challenges. Amid a sociocultural paradigm prioritising the elimination of fetal risks, available evidence and guidance are limited, and current decision making on antenatal drugs mostly proceeds in an ad-hoc and, often, biased manner. This approach might undermine the health of both mother and child. The need for a systematic approach towards antenatal drug decisions is becoming even more pressing with the growing knowledge of pregnancy-induced changes in drug disposition and effects. With this new complexity, pregnancy-specific doses might be necessary, potentially altering the balance between maternal and fetal benefits and risks. In this Viewpoint, we argue that ethical principles and a pregnant individual's values must be integrated alongside existing evidence when making decisions on antenatal drug use and dosing. We use the example of sertraline to outline practical strategies for achieving this goal. This approach is urgently needed to foster better-informed and balanced decisions on antenatal pharmacotherapy.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140673624020695; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(24)02069-5; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85207904636&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39488410; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0140673624020695; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736%2824%2902069-5
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know