Effect of chemical modifications on the susceptibility of collagen to proteolysis. II. Dehydrothermal crosslinking
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, ISSN: 0141-8130, Vol: 14, Issue: 3, Page: 129-138
1992
- 89Citations
- 66Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations89
- Citation Indexes89
- 89
- CrossRef63
- Captures66
- Readers66
- 66
Article Description
Collagen was dehydrothermally treated (heat cured) by heating dry under vacuum at 60, 80, 100 and 120°C. The change in stability was determined by subjecting to measurement of gross crosslinking, content of lysino-alanine and naturally occurring collagen crosslinks, shrinkage temperature ( T M ), susceptibility to digestion by lysosomal thiol proteases, and susceptibility to pepsin and trypsin. Morphological changes were examined by electron microscopy. The in vivo biodegradation of dehydrothermally treated collagen sponges was investigated using a rat lumbar muscle implantation model for up to 28 days. For all heat-cured collagens, the data strongly indicated that both crosslinking and denaturation/degradation was present in increasing quantities with increasing temperature of treatment, its level was too low (maximum 179 pmol mg −1 ) to account for the decreased solubility and increased molecular weight gross changes observed. Increasing resistance of treated collagen to both lysosomal cathepsins and pepsin correlated well with increased crosslinking and increasing temperature of the heat-curing process. However, increased denaturation/degradation of the collagen at higher temperatures was revealed by electrophoretic analysis, trypsin hydrolysis data and by electron microscopy. Differential scanning calorimetry (d.s.c.) correlated well with these results showing an increased level of denaturation in heated samples. The in vivo study showed little difference between control and heat-cured samples except for the material treated at 120°C which was biodegraded in vivo at a significantly faster rate. The data shows, therefore, that crosslinking induced by the dehydrothermal treatment of collagen decreases its rate of proteolysis at acid pH in vitro. However, the simultaneous denaturation/degradation of the protein during the heat-cure process appears to be a more important factor in determining the fate of the material implanted into rat muscle.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141813005800029; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0141-8130(05)80002-9; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0026638594&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1390444; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0141813005800029; http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0141813005800029; http://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0141813005800029?httpAccept=text/xml; http://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0141813005800029?httpAccept=text/plain; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0141-8130%2805%2980002-9; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0141-8130%2805%2980002-9
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know