Factors controlling measures of anxiety and responses to novelty in the mouse
Behavioural Brain Research, ISSN: 0166-4328, Vol: 125, Issue: 1, Page: 151-157
2001
- 359Citations
- 275Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations359
- Citation Indexes359
- 359
- CrossRef299
- Captures275
- Readers275
- 275
Article Description
This review focuses on factors influencing behaviour in the elevated plus-maze, the holeboard and the social transmission of food preference. The elevated plus-maze provides independent measures of anxiety (percentage of time spent on open arms) and activity (number of closed arm entries) and can be used in both males and females. Important sex differences emerge in factor loadings, and, whereas in males, anxiety is the primary factor, in females it is activity. On trial 2 in the plus-maze, the nature of the anxiety state is changed and thus this maze can be used to screen for possible genetic alterations in two distinct anxiety states. The holeboard provides independent measures of exploration and locomotor activity and habituation between sessions provides a useful measure of learning. Mice display neophobia and avoid novel foods, but information about their safety can be socially transmitted. A mouse that has sampled a novel food will be actively sniffed by others on its return to the colony. It is important to control for possible changes in social investigation, neophobia, olfactory sensitivity, anxiety and exploration, before it is concluded that a changed performance in this task is due to changes in learning.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166432801002923; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0166-4328(01)00292-3; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0035829365&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11682106; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0166432801002923; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0166-4328%2801%2900292-3; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0166-4328%2801%2900292-3
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know