In vitro assessment of oral lipid based formulations
Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, ISSN: 0169-409X, Vol: 50, Issue: SUPPL. 1, Page: S127-S147
2001
- 357Citations
- 223Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations357
- Citation Indexes356
- 356
- CrossRef260
- Patent Family Citations1
- Patent Families1
- Captures223
- Readers223
- 223
Article Description
In recent years there has been an increase in interest in the utility of lipid based delivery systems, at least in part as a result of the effective development of lipid based products such as Sandimmun Neoral ® (cyclosporin), Norvir ® (ritonavir) and Fortovase ® (saquinavir). The development pathway for lipid based formulations, however, is still largely empirical, and in vitro models that are predictive of oral bioavailability enhancement are lacking. The use of modified dissolution media, reflecting the bile salt and phospholipid levels in the intestine, has met with some success in terms of the ability to predict the bioavailability of poorly water soluble drugs and the potential bioavailability enhancing effects of food. These approaches, however, do not have the flexibility or complexity to deal with the interactions inherent in the digestion, dispersion and solubilisation of a lipid based formulation and the coincident dissolution profile of a co-administered drug. In this review, the utility of modified dissolution media to predict the impact of food on the absorption of poorly water soluble, lipophilic drugs, is explored. These dissolution based systems are subsequently contrasted with the use of lipid digestion models which have found increasing application in assessment of the interaction of digestible dose forms with the gastrointestinal milieu.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169409X0100182X; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0169-409x(01)00182-x; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0035478436&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11576699; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0169409X0100182X; http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0169409X0100182X; http://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0169409X0100182X?httpAccept=text/xml; http://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0169409X0100182X?httpAccept=text/plain; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0169-409x%2801%2900182-x; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0169-409x%2801%2900182-x
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know