Developments in pig breeding and the role of research
Livestock Production Science, ISSN: 0301-6226, Vol: 72, Issue: 1, Page: 43-48
2001
- 12Citations
- 24Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Pig breeding has developed into a knowledge-intensive activity. Breeding companies make extensive use of electronic equipment for measurement of selection traits in various tiers of the production pyramid, of database technology and of increasingly complicated statistical methods to derive selection criteria. Molecular genetics (marker-assisted selection/introgression) requires additional development of laboratory techniques and processing of data together with phenotypic observations. Reproductive techniques (AI, ET) and the interaction of the genotype with the production environment (nutrition, health, climate, housing) pose additional R&D requirements. The technology required for these processes was traditionally developed at universities and research institutes, and disseminated into the industry on a non-obligation basis. At a later stage, breeding companies were contractually involved in public research projects (e.g. PhD students), the results of which were often subject to some degree of confidentiality. Increasingly, breeding companies employ their own R&D staff to develop methods in-house, especially in the fields of data recording and molecular genetics; the results of such work are usually not (fully) published. It follows that the role of R&D in pig breeding is evolving in two mutually connected ways: (i) it is of increasing importance for product development, and therefore requires increased funding, and (ii) it is increasingly carried out in-house or on a contractual basis. We discuss the likely future patterns of this evolution, and the impact these will have on the industry.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301622601002652; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0301-6226(01)00265-2; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0035669651&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0301622601002652; http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0301622601002652; http://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0301622601002652?httpAccept=text/xml; http://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0301622601002652?httpAccept=text/plain; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0301-6226%2801%2900265-2; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0301-6226%2801%2900265-2
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know