Role of artificial neural networks in prediction of survival of burn patients—a new approach
Burns, ISSN: 0305-4179, Vol: 28, Issue: 6, Page: 579-586
2002
- 37Citations
- 47Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations37
- Citation Indexes37
- 37
- CrossRef21
- Captures47
- Readers47
- 47
Article Description
A burn patient may require the most complicated treatment regimes encountered among trauma victims. Predicting the outcome of such treatment depends on several factors which have non-linear relationships. Traditional methods in prediction are “logistic regression” and “maximum likelihood”. In this study, an artificial neural network (ANN) is used for computing survival among burn patients admitted to the “Motahary Burn Center”, during a 1 year period (1996–1997). Fifteen different observations, such as total body surface area (TBSA), rescue time, admission period, surgery, inhalation injuries, etc. were obtained, retrospectively. A normal feed forward ANN was developed by Thinkspro software. It has 15 input-units, two hidden layers, and one output-unit. Survival was higher in males, those in whom early fluid resuscitation had been initiated and in patients in the middle of the age spectrum ( P <0.0001). Strong correlations with these factors were noted.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305417902000451; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0305-4179(02)00045-1; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0036768724&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12220917; http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0305417902000451; http://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0305417902000451?httpAccept=text/xml; http://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0305417902000451?httpAccept=text/plain; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0305417902000451; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0305-4179%2802%2900045-1; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0305-4179%2802%2900045-1
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know