Effects of surgery and other experimental factors on the evaluation of middle ear function in gekkonoid lizards
Hearing Research, ISSN: 0378-5955, Vol: 160, Issue: 1, Page: 22-30
2001
- 5Citations
- 9Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations5
- Citation Indexes5
- CrossRef5
- Captures9
- Readers9
Article Description
This study examines three artificial factors likely to cause variation between results from different investigations of auditory function, at least in lizards. Controlled tests were performed on gecko lizards, by external laser interferometry of the middle ear transfer function at the tympanic membrane (TM). In conclusion, studies of middle ear function should examine motion both at the insertion of the columella–extracolumella shaft onto the TM, and at the tip of the extracolumellar pars inferior, because the internal proportions and function of the extracolumellar lever vary among species. At least in scansorial geckos, auditory experiments may be conducted with the animal on its back, as this posture introduces no acoustic artifacts. Positioning the subject on its belly, with the throat resting on the substrate, imposes small but significant artifacts on middle ear function. Similar artifacts occur with the belly up but the throat loaded with a modeling clay plate. The surgical fenestration of the ventral throat wall, common in auditory studies on lizards, causes (at least in Eublepharis ) artificial enhancement of sensitivity at low frequencies and erratic responses at high frequencies.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378595501003318; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0378-5955(01)00331-8; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0034803873&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11591487; http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0378595501003318; http://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0378595501003318?httpAccept=text/xml; http://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0378595501003318?httpAccept=text/plain; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0378595501003318; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0378-5955%2801%2900331-8; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0378-5955%2801%2900331-8
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know