More about the axial anomaly on the lattice
Nuclear Physics B, ISSN: 0550-3213, Vol: 644, Issue: 1, Page: 383-394
2002
- 12Citations
- 2Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
We study the axial anomaly defined on a finite-size lattice by using a Dirac operator which obeys the Ginsparg–Wilson relation. When the gauge group is U(1), we show that the basic structure of axial anomaly on the infinite lattice, which can be deduced by a cohomological analysis, persists even on (sufficiently large) finite-size lattices. For non-Abelian gauge groups, we propose a conjecture on a possible form of axial anomaly on the infinite lattice, which holds to all orders in perturbation theory. With this conjecture, we show that a structure of the axial anomaly on finite-size lattices is again basically identical to that on the infinite lattice. Our analysis with the Ginsparg–Wilson–Dirac operator indicates that, in appropriate frameworks, the basic structure of axial anomaly is quite robust and it persists even in a system with finite ultraviolet and infrared cutoffs.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S055032130200812X; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0550-3213(02)00812-x; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0037064440&origin=inward; http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S055032130200812X; http://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S055032130200812X?httpAccept=text/xml; http://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S055032130200812X?httpAccept=text/plain; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S055032130200812X; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0550-3213%2802%2900812-x; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0550-3213%2802%2900812-x
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know