Preoperative planning for total hip arthroplasty
The Journal of Arthroplasty, ISSN: 0883-5403, Vol: 7, Page: 403-409
1992
- 148Citations
- 73Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations148
- Citation Indexes148
- 148
- CrossRef123
- Captures73
- Readers73
- 65
Article Description
This study evaluated the usefulness and accuracy of preoperative planning for cemented and cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA). The authors conducted a prospective study of 110 consecutive primary cases in which surgeons recorded the preoperative plan and what occurred in each case. Measured variables included estimated magnification, acetabular cup and femoral stem size, planned lengthening, and anticipated problems. Preoperative estimates of magnification frequently differed from actual magnification, and in 17% of cases it affected choice of implant size. Preoperative bone morphology did not correlate with type of femoral stem fixation. Implant sizing was predicted from the preoperative plan for 62% of acetabular cups, 78% of cemented stems, and 42% of the cementless stems. Leg-length equalization was a goal in only 70% of cases. Anticipated problems focused on anatomic variations, but intraoperative problems involved technique and equipment. The authors conclude that surgeons need better methods to estimate magnification and bone morphology from preoperative radiographs. Preoperative planning may not reduce intraoperative complications, which can arise from unanticipated technique and equipment mishaps.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883540307800313; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0883-5403(07)80031-3; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0026438998&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1431923; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0883540307800313; http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0883540307800313; http://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0883540307800313?httpAccept=text/xml; http://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0883540307800313?httpAccept=text/plain; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0883-5403%2807%2980031-3; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0883-5403%2807%2980031-3
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know