Tumour suppressors—a fly's perspective
European Journal of Cancer, ISSN: 0959-8049, Vol: 39, Issue: 10, Page: 1355-1362
2003
- 16Citations
- 38Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations16
- Citation Indexes16
- 16
- CrossRef15
- Captures38
- Readers38
- 38
Review Description
For a century, the little fruitfly Drosophila melanogaster has taught generations of geneticists about how genes control the development of a multicellular organism. More recently, Drosophila has begun to contribute more directly towards our understanding of human disease [Bernards A, Hariharan IK. Of flies and men—studying human disease in Drosophila. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2001, 11, 274–278]. It is capable of doing this because it shares many disease-related genes with us. For example, the Drosophila genome sequencing project has revealed that two thirds of the genes implicated in human cancers have a counterpart in the fly genome [Adams MD, Celniker SE, Holt RA, et al. The genome sequence of Drosophila melanogaster. Science 2000, 287, 2185–2195, Fortini ME, Skupski MP, Boguski MS, Hariharan IK. A survey of human disease gene counterparts in the Drosophila genome. J Cell Biol 2000, 150, F23–30]. In particular, the fly has homologues of the Retinoblastoma protein (pRb) and of p53, two prototypical tumour suppressors which are inactivated in the majority of human tumours. Here, we will compare the fly's tumour suppressors with their human counterparts and we will review recent advances in our understanding of how these factors function in the fly.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959804903002636; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0959-8049(03)00263-6; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0037784233&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12826037; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0959804903002636; http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0959804903002636; http://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0959804903002636?httpAccept=text/xml; http://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0959804903002636?httpAccept=text/plain; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0959-8049%2803%2900263-6; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0959-8049%2803%2900263-6
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know