The current contribution of molecular factors to risk estimation in neuroblastoma patients
European Journal of Cancer, ISSN: 0959-8049, Vol: 33, Issue: 12, Page: 2092-2097
1997
- 50Citations
- 11Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations50
- Citation Indexes50
- 50
- CrossRef46
- Captures11
- Readers11
- 11
Article Description
The association of molecular characteristics with prognosis has been reported, but not their relationship with each other and their impact in the context of known clinical risk factors. In this study, data of 1249 consecutive intent-to-treat-neuroblastoma patients with more than 1 year follow-up were examined by multivariate analysis using loglinear and Cox proportional hazard regression models on a stage-related basis (stages 1–3: 600, 4S: 116, 4: 533). In a first step, risk factors were identified from 18 selected clinical variables, and risk groups defined. The second step investigated whether molecular characteristics ( MYC N, LOH 1p, del 1p, CD44, N- ras, NGF-R, bcl-2, APO-1 (CD95)) contributed additional prognostic information to the model. The loglinear model demonstrated several interactions between clinical factors. By the Cox regression model, seven independent clinical risk factors were found for stages 1–3, seven for stage 4 and two for stage 4S. By subsequent introduction of all molecular variables, MYC N amplification only added significant prognostic information to the clinical factors in localised and stage 4 neuroblastoma. The models allowed the definition of risk groups for stages 1–3 patients by age ( eβ = 5.09) and MYC N ( eβ = 4.26), for stage 4 by MYC N ( eβ = 2.78) and number of symptoms ( eβ = 2.44) and for stage 4S by platelet count ( eβ = 3.91) and general condition ( eβ = 2.99). Molecular factors and in particular MYC N contribute significantly to risk estimation. In conjunction with clinical factors, they are powerful tools to define risk groups in neuroblastoma.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959804997002372; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0959-8049(97)00237-2; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0031417490&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9516860; http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0959804997002372; http://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0959804997002372?httpAccept=text/xml; http://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0959804997002372?httpAccept=text/plain; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0959804997002372; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0959-8049%2897%2900237-2; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0959-8049%2897%2900237-2
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know