Diffusivity Models and Greenhouse Gases Fluxes from a Forest, Pasture, Grassland and Corn Field in Northern Hokkaido, Japan
Pedosphere, ISSN: 1002-0160, Vol: 20, Issue: 6, Page: 747-760
2010
- 14Citations
- 36Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Information on the most influential factors determining gas flux from soils is needed in predictive models for greenhouse gases emissions. We conducted an intensive soil and air sampling along a 2000 m transect extending from a forest, pasture, grassland and corn field in Shizunai, Hokkaido (Japan), measured CO 2, CH 4, N 2 O and NO fluxes and calculated soil bulk density (ρ b ), air-filled porosity ( f a ) and total porosity (Φ). Using diffusivity models based on either f a alone or on a combination of f a and Φ, we predicted two pore space indices: the relative gas diffusion coefficient ( D s /D o ) and the pore tortuosity factor (τ). The relationships between pore space indices ( D s / D o and τ) and CO 2, CH 4, N 2 O and NO fluxes were also studied. Results showed that the grassland had the highest ρ b while f a and Φ were the highest in the forest. CO 2, CH 4, N 2 O and NO fluxes were the highest in the grassland while N 2 O dominated in the corn field. Few correlations existed between f a, Φ, ρ b and gases fluxes while all models predicted that D s /D o and τ significantly correlated with CO 2 and CH 4 with correlation coefficient ( r ) ranging from 0.20 to 0.80. Overall, diffusivity models based on f a alone gave higher D s /D o, lower τ, and higher R 2 and better explained the relationship between pore space indices ( D s /D o and τ) and gases fluxes. Inclusion of D s / D o and τ in predictive models will improve our understanding of the dynamics of greenhouse gas fluxes from soils. D s /D o and τ can be easily obtained by measurements of soil air and water and existing diffusivity models.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1002016010600653; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1002-0160(10)60065-3; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=77958545986&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1002016010600653; http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1002016010600653; http://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S1002016010600653?httpAccept=text/xml; http://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S1002016010600653?httpAccept=text/plain; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1002-0160%2810%2960065-3; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1002-0160%2810%2960065-3; http://sciencechina.cn/gw.jsp?action=cited_outline.jsp&type=1&id=4048609&internal_id=4048609&from=elsevier
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know