Cetuximab, gemcitabine, and oxaliplatin in patients with unresectable advanced or metastatic biliary tract cancer: a phase 2 study
The Lancet Oncology, ISSN: 1470-2045, Vol: 11, Issue: 12, Page: 1142-1148
2010
- 225Citations
- 107Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations225
- Citation Indexes222
- 222
- CrossRef162
- Policy Citations2
- 2
- Clinical Citations1
- 1
- Captures107
- Readers107
- 107
Article Description
Patients with biliary tract cancer have a poor prognosis, and, until recently, no standard palliative chemotherapy has been defined. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of cetuximab in combination with gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (GEMOX) for first-line treatment of biliary tract cancer. From Oct 1, 2006, to July 26, 2008, patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic biliary tract cancer were sequentially enrolled and treated at one centre in Austria. All patients received intravenous infusions of 500 mg/m 2 cetuximab on day 1, 1000 mg/m 2 gemcitabine on day 1, and 100 mg/m 2 oxaliplatin on day 2, every 2 weeks for 12 cycles. The primary outcome was overall response rate. Analysis was by intention to treat. Adverse reactions were assessed according to National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria. The study is completed and registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01216345. 30 patients with median age of 68 years (IQR 62–73) were enrolled and included in the analysis. Objective response occurred in 19 patients (63%; 95% CI 56·2–69·8), of whom three (10%; 3·2–16·8) achieved complete response, and 16 (53%; 46·2–59·8) achieved partial response. Nine patients underwent potentially curative secondary resection after major response to therapy. Grade 3 adverse events were recorded in 13 patients: skin rash (n=4), peripheral neuropathy (n=4), thrombocytopenia (n=3), nausea (n=1), diarrhoea (n=1), and neutropenia (n=1); no grade 4 adverse events were recorded. Cetuximab plus GEMOX was well tolerated and had encouraging antitumour activity, leading to secondary resection in a third of patients. These findings warrant further study of cetuximab plus GEMOX in a large randomised trial. Association of Research on the Biology of Liver Tumors, Vienna, Austria.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470204510702473; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(10)70247-3; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=78649581706&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21071270; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01216345; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1470204510702473; http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1470204510702473; http://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S1470204510702473?httpAccept=text/xml; http://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S1470204510702473?httpAccept=text/plain; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045%2810%2970247-3; http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanonc/article/PIIS1470-2045(10)70247-3/abstract
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know