Essentials of filoviral load quantification
The Lancet Infectious Diseases, ISSN: 1473-3099, Vol: 16, Issue: 7, Page: e134-e138
2016
- 12Citations
- 45Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations12
- Citation Indexes12
- 12
- CrossRef9
- Captures45
- Readers45
- 45
- Mentions1
- References1
- Wikipedia1
Review Description
Quantitative measurement of viral load is an important parameter in the management of filovirus disease outbreaks because viral load correlates with severity of disease, survival, and infectivity. During the ongoing Ebola virus disease outbreak in parts of Western Africa, most assays used in the detection of Ebola virus disease by more than 44 diagnostic laboratories yielded qualitative results. Regulatory hurdles involved in validating quantitative assays and the urgent need for a rapid Ebola virus disease diagnosis precluded development of validated quantitative assays during the outbreak. Because of sparse quantitative data obtained from these outbreaks, opportunities for study of correlations between patient outcome, changes in viral load during the course of an outbreak, disease course in asymptomatic individuals, and the potential for virus transmission between infected patients and contacts have been limited. We strongly urge the continued development of quantitative viral load assays to carefully evaluate these parameters in future outbreaks of filovirus disease.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1473309916300639; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1473-3099(16)30063-9; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84975226380&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27296694; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1473309916300639; http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1473309916300639; http://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S1473309916300639?httpAccept=text/xml; http://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S1473309916300639?httpAccept=text/plain; http://hdl.handle.net/10144/613522
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know