Human schistosomiasis in the post mass drug administration era
The Lancet Infectious Diseases, ISSN: 1473-3099, Vol: 17, Issue: 2, Page: e42-e48
2017
- 87Citations
- 271Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations87
- Citation Indexes86
- 86
- CrossRef84
- Policy Citations1
- Policy Citation1
- Captures271
- Readers271
- 271
Review Description
Profound changes are occurring in the epidemiology of schistosomiasis, a neglected tropical disease caused by a chronic infection with parasitic helminths of the genus Schistosoma. Schistosomiasis currently affects 240 million people worldwide, mostly in sub-Saharan Africa. The advent and proliferation of mass drug administration (MDA) programmes using the drug praziquantel is resulting in substantial increases in the number of people, mainly children aged 6–14 years, being effectively treated, approaching the point where most people in endemic areas will receive one or more treatments during their lifetimes. Praziquantel treatment not only cures infection but also frees the host from the powerful immunomodulatory action of the parasites. The treatment simultaneously enhances exposure to key parasite antigens, accelerating the development of protective acquired immunity, which would take many years to develop naturally. At a population level, these changes constitute a substantial alteration to schistosome ecology in that the parasites are more likely to be exposed not only to praziquantel directly but also to hosts with altered immune phenotypes. Here, we consider the consequences of this for schistosome biology, immunoepidemiology, and public health. We anticipate that there could be substantial effects on chronic pathology, natural immunity, vaccine development strategies, immune disorders, and drug efficacy. This makes for a complex picture that will only become apparent over decades. We recommend careful monitoring and assessment to accompany the roll-out of MDA programmes to ensure that the considerable health benefits to populations are achieved and sustained.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1473309916304753; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1473-3099(16)30475-3; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85008410772&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27988094; http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1473309916304753; http://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S1473309916304753?httpAccept=text/xml; http://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S1473309916304753?httpAccept=text/plain; https://facultyopinions.com/prime/727120987#eval793550914; http://dx.doi.org/10.3410/f.727120987.793550914; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1473309916304753
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know