Les CBNPC de stades avancés hors addiction oncogénique : les traitements systémiques de deuxième ligne
Revue des Maladies Respiratoires Actualités, ISSN: 1877-1203, Vol: 12, Issue: 2, Page: 2S185-2S194
2020
- 9Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
L’avènement de l’immunothérapie comme pierre angulaire du traitement de première ligne des cancers bronchiques non à petites cellules de stade avancé, sans addiction oncogénique, a conduit à modifier l’algorithme thérapeutique de seconde ligne, précédemment basé majoritairement sur l’utilisation des anti-PD(L)-1 en monothérapie. Le traitement de seconde ligne est actuellement représenté soit par un doublet à base de sels de platine chez les patients traités en première ligne par pembrolizumab en monothérapie, soit chez les patients traités par association chimiothérapie-immunothérapie par les chimiothérapies standard de seconde ligne, le docétaxel quelle que soit l’histologie ou le pemetrexed pour les carcinomes non épidermoïdes si non utilisé en première ligne. L’addition d’un traitement anti-angiogénique au docétaxel améliore modestement la survie des patients mais le nintedanib et le ramucirumab ne sont pas disponibles en France. Le futur du traitement de seconde ligne nécessitera une meilleure connaissance des mécanismes de résistance aux anti-PD(L)-1 et de nouveaux essais cliniques randomisés de phase III afin d’optimiser les options thérapeutiques, avec ou sans rechallenge à une immunothérapie, destinées à restaurer la réponse immunitaire anti-tumorale. © 2020 SPLF. Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés. The emergence of immunotherapy as the cornerstone of first line therapy in advanced stage non-small cell lung cancer, without oncogenic driver, has led to change the treatment algorithm of second line, which was previously and mainly based on anti-PD(L)-1 given as a single agent. Second-line treatment is currently based on chemotherapy, with a platinum-based doublet for patients treated in first line by pembrolizumab alone, and standard second-line chemotherapy options for patients treated by chemotherapy-immunotherapy combinations, i.e. docétaxel regardless of histology or pemetrexed for non-squamous cell carcinoma when not used in first line. Addition of an antiangiogenic agent to docétaxel only achieved a modest improvement of overall survival but neither nintedanib, nor docétaxel is available in France. The future of second line treatment would require a better knowledge and understanding of resistance mechanisms to anti-PD(L)-1, and randomized phase III clinical trials, in order to optimize therapeutic options, including or not a rechallenge to an immunotherapy, targeting to restore anti-tumour immune response. © 2020 SPLF. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877120320300999; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1877-1203(20)30099-9; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85092164675&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1877120320300999; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1877-1203%2820%2930099-9; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1877-1203%2820%2930099-9
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know