Editorial bias in scientific publications
Neurología (English Edition), ISSN: 2173-5808, Vol: 26, Issue: 1, Page: 1-5
2011
- 7Citations
- 42Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations7
- Citation Indexes7
- CrossRef7
- Captures42
- Readers42
- 42
- Mentions1
- Blog Mentions1
- Blog1
Most Recent Blog
More than just being open: giving control to authors and credit to peer reviewers
“Painful”. That was the one-word answer from a researcher when I asked about her experiences over many years with the general publishing process, regardless of journal or publisher. Painful to submit, painful to share data, painful to decipher what reviewers and editors are asking of them when they receive contradicting comments, etc. Painful to submit, painful to share data, painful to decipher w
Article Description
Many authors believe that there are biases in scientific publications. Editorial biases include publication bias; which refers to those situations where the results influence the editor's decision, and editorial bias refers to those situations where factors related with authors or their environment influence the decision.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173580811700013; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s2173-5808(11)70001-3; http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2173580811700013; http://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S2173580811700013?httpAccept=text/plain; http://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S2173580811700013?httpAccept=text/xml; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2173580811700013; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s2173-5808%2811%2970001-3; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s2173-5808%2811%2970001-3
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know