Ultrasound imaging for identification of cerebral damage in congenital Zika virus syndrome: a case series
The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health, ISSN: 2352-4642, Vol: 1, Issue: 1, Page: 45-55
2017
- 37Citations
- 90Captures
- 2Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations37
- Citation Indexes35
- 35
- CrossRef33
- Policy Citations2
- Policy Citation2
- Captures90
- Readers90
- 90
- Mentions2
- News Mentions2
- News2
Most Recent News
Microcephaly and ZIKA Virus: Certainty or Presumption? Systematic Review /Microcefalia y Virus Zika: ¿Certeza o Presunción? Revisión Sistemática.
Introduction Zika virus (ZIKV) is an arbovirus transmitted by the Aedes aegypti mosquito bite. It was first isolated in the forests of Zika (Uganda) from
Article Description
Zika virus is a novel teratogenic agent associated with cerebral anomalies. Because of the challenges associated with assessment of antenatal diagnosis and prognosis in fetuses, screening for other congenital infections mostly relies on ultrasound. We aimed to assess whether a similar approach might be adequate for Zika virus congenital syndrome provided that early markers of infection and adequate timing for screening are established. For this case series we reviewed all pregnant women who had a laboratory-confirmed Zika virus infection in their first trimester or early second trimester and abnormal fetal ultrasound findings who were managed at the Pluridisciplinary Center for Prenatal Diagnosis of Martinique during the Zika virus epidemic (Jan 1, 2016, to Nov 10, 2016) in Martinique, a French Caribbean island. Ultrasound imaging was done with GE Healthcare Voluson E10 and E8 machines with abdominal and vaginal probes. We analysed 14 cases of pregnant women with confirmed Zika virus infection and fetal abnormalities of the brain, and 31 ultrasound imaging results. Between 16 and 20 weeks of gestation, four (33%) of 12 fetuses had an abnormal ultrasound examination. Anomalies were detected in nine (90%) of the ten fetuses from whom ultrasound images were obtained between 20 and 24 weeks of gestation. All five remaining fetuses at 24–28 weeks of gestation, and all four after 28 weeks, had severe anomalies. Major anomalies identified were ventriculomegaly (12 fetuses, 86%), cortical atrophy (11, 79%), calcifications (ten, 71%; particularly located at the corticosubcortical junction), and anomalies of the corpus callosum (ten, 71%). Prenatal assessment of head circumference measurement by imaging was not an effective screening tool for congenital Zika virus infection, with microcephaly only identified in nine (64%) fetuses. Ultrasound monitoring appears to be a good screening strategy to monitor Zika virus-exposed pregnancies. Public health efforts should focus on scanning at 22–26 weeks of gestation. Identification of ventriculomegaly, cortical atrophy, calcifications, and anomalies of the corpus callosum should prompt laboratory screening for Zika virus. None.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352464217300019; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s2352-4642(17)30001-9; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85031742788&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30169227; http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2352464217300019; http://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S2352464217300019?httpAccept=text/xml; http://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S2352464217300019?httpAccept=text/plain; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2352464217300019; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s2352-4642%2817%2930001-9; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s2352-4642%2817%2930001-9
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know