SILACtor: Software to enable dynamic SILAC studies
Analytical Chemistry, ISSN: 0003-2700, Vol: 83, Issue: 22, Page: 8403-8410
2011
- 12Citations
- 54Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations12
- Citation Indexes12
- CrossRef12
- 11
- Captures54
- Readers54
- 54
Article Description
Stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture (SILAC) is a versatile tool in proteomics that has been used to explore protein turnover on a large scale. However, these studies pose a significant undertaking that can be greatly simplified through the use of computational tools that automate the data analysis. While SILAC technology has enjoyed rapid adoption through the availability of several software tools, algorithms do not exist for the automated analysis of protein turnover data generated using SILAC technology. Presented here is a software tool, SILACtor, designed to trace and compare SILAC-labeled peptides across multiple time points. SILACtor is used to profile protein turnover rates for more than 500 HeLa cell proteins using a SILAC label-chase approach. Additionally, SILACtor contains a method for the automated generation of accurate mass and retention time inclusion lists that target peptides of interest showing fast or slow turnover rates relative to the other peptides observed in the samples. SILACtor enables improved protein turnover studies using SILAC technology and also provides a framework for features extensible to comparative SILAC analyses and targeted methods. © 2011 American Chemical Society.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know