In vitro and in vivo chemical labeling of ribosomal proteins: A quantitative comparison
Analytical Chemistry, ISSN: 0003-2700, Vol: 84, Issue: 21, Page: 9355-9361
2012
- 8Citations
- 12Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations8
- Citation Indexes8
- CrossRef7
- Captures12
- Readers12
- 12
Article Description
Thioimidates have emerged as reagents for probing the protein structure, folding, and interactions under physiological conditions. The same properties that give thioimidates biological relevance make these molecules ideal candidates for use in vivo. Through labeling of ribosomal proteins, we have quantified the in vivo and in vitro reactivity of two thioimidates: S-methylthioacetimidate (SMTA) and a novel, charge-carrying analogue, S-sulfethylthioacetimidate (SSETA). In vitro experiments demonstrate that both amidinating reagents can probe the protein structure. Under comparable in vivo conditions, SMTA is found to be membrane-permeable while SSETA is not. The use of mass spectrometry with permeant and impermeant thioimidates promises insights into the membrane topology and protein structure in the native environment. © 2012 American Chemical Society.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know