Element-Coded Affinity Tags for Peptides and Proteins
Bioconjugate Chemistry, ISSN: 1043-1802, Vol: 15, Issue: 1, Page: 3-6
2004
- 112Citations
- 50Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations112
- Citation Indexes112
- 112
- CrossRef92
- Captures50
- Readers50
- 50
Article Description
Isotope-coded affinity tags (ICAT) represent an important new tool for the analysis of complex mixtures of proteins in living systems [Aebersold, R., and Mann, M. (2003) Nature, 422, 198-207]. We envisage an alternative protein-labeling technique based on tagging with different element-coded metal chelates, which affords affinity chromatography, quantification, and identification of a tagged peptide from a complex mixture. As proof of concept, a synthetic peptide was modified at a cysteine side chain with either a carboxymethyl group or acetamidobenzyl-1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-N,N′ ,N″,N‴-tetraacetic acid (AcBD) chelates of terbium or yttrium. A mixture of the three modified peptides in a mole ratio of 100:1.0:0.83 carboxymethyl:AcBD-Tb:AcBD-Y was trypsinized, purified on a new affinity column that binds rare-earth DOTA chelates, and analyzed by LC-MS/MS. Chelate-tagged tryptic peptides eluted cleanly from the affinity column; the tagged peptides chromatographically coeluted during LC-MS analysis, were present in the expected ratio as indicated by MS ion intensity, and were sequence-identified by tandem mass spectrometry. DOTA-rare earth chelates have exceptional properties for use as affinity tags. They are highly polar and water-soluble. Many of the rare earth elements are naturally monoisotopic, providing a variety of simple choices for preparing mass tags. Further, the rare earths are heavy elements, whose mass defects give the masses of tagged peptides exact values not normally shared by molecules that contain only light elements.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know