Fast, Routine Free Energy of Binding Estimation Using MovableType
ACS Symposium Series, ISSN: 1947-5918, Vol: 1397, Page: 247-265
2021
- 2Citations
- 5Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Book Chapter Description
Rigorous free energy of binding estimation using biomolecular structural ensembles has been of significant interest to the computational chemistry field for decades. With the advent of faster, smarter computers coupled with better algorithms and interfaces, in recent years these methods have been gaining traction in the industrial pharmaceutical space. Ultimately, the success of free energy methods rests with our ability to accurately sample the relevant conformational space (the sampling problem), while concurrently performing that sampling with the correct probability or energy (the energetics problem). The multi-dimensional integral of the partition function requires a numerical approximation for molecular ensemble sampling and for partition function estimation. Most conventional approaches to free energy methods rely on compute-intensive molecular dynamics (MD) based simulations for protein:ligand sampling. These simulations are expensive and often require specialized hardware (e.g., dedicated graphics processing units or purpose-built computer processors) utilized over hours or days for a single protein:ligand complex. This makes high-throughput screening difficult as the computational expense can become astronomical when considering more than a handful of compounds. MovableType addresses this problem by separating sampling into Local Sampling, which is treatment of protein:ligand conformer(s) using a “blurring” or “smearing” approach, and Global Sampling, which includes an ensemble of protein:ligand conformers supplied through conventional rigid-receptor/flexible-ligand docking, flexible-receptor/flexible-ligand (induced-fit) docking, rotamer/backbone (flip-state) sampling, tautomer/protomer state sampling, or even MD trajectories. In this work, we focus on results obtained with docking, and we compare these results to other free energy methods. Finally, we also touch on some new methods which will be introduced in upcoming publications.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know