Sustainability indicators for chemical processes: II. Data needs
Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, ISSN: 0888-5885, Vol: 51, Issue: 5, Page: 2329-2353
2012
- 86Citations
- 210Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
To begin repair of the environmental quality of the planet, there is a need to embrace sustainable development at many levels of the chemical industry and society. One such manner in which the chemical industry is responding to this need is through sustainability evaluations, retrofits, and new process designs. For improving the sustainability of chemical processes, the first contribution of this set of articles presented a taxonomic classification, definition, and scale for measuring sustainability indicators according to the GREENSCOPE (Gauging Reaction Effectiveness for the ENvironmental Sustainability of Chemistries with a multi-Objective Process Evaluator) methodology. To generate a sustainability assessment and yield a more sustainable process in the end, a model must have available data; that is, data are not the final goal but are mandatory to arrive there. This second contribution extends this methodology by identifying data requirements when calculating the indicators. Each indicator is mathematically defined, emphasizing realistic usage, and connecting the mathematical formulas for the indicators with their data requirements. In addition, data-source alternatives to fulfill the input requirements and potential data gaps for the calculation of the sustainability indicators for a new process technology or an existing manufacturing plant are proposed and discussed. This work further provides the practical connection between theoretical definitions of sustainability, data needs, and mathematical definitions of indicators for process sustainability assessment. With the accomplishment of this second contribution, sustainability assessment can be achieved and proposed as a reliable and robust tool for the development and optimization of chemical processes. © 2011 American Chemical Society.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know