NIR determination of major constituents in tropical root and tuber crop flours
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, ISSN: 0021-8561, Vol: 57, Issue: 22, Page: 10539-10547
2009
- 69Citations
- 118Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations69
- Citation Indexes69
- 69
- CrossRef59
- Captures118
- Readers118
- 118
Article Description
Tropical root and tuber crops (cassava, sweet potato, taro, and yam) are staples in developing countries where rapid urbanization Is strengthening the demand for flour based foods. Quality control techniques are still under development, and when available, laboratory analyses are too expensive. The objectives of this study were to calibrate Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) for routine analysis of flours and to test its reliability to determine their major constituents. Flours prepared from 472 accessions (traditional varieties and breeding lines) were analyzed for their starch, total sugars, cellulose, total nitrogen, and ash (total minerals) contents. The near-infrared (350-2500 nm) spectra of all samples were measured. Calibration equations with cross and independent validation for all analytical characteristics were computed using the partial least squares method. Models were developed separately for each of the four crop species and by combining data from all spp. to predict values within each of them. The quality of prediction was evaluated on a test set of 94 accessions (20%) by standard error of prediction (SEP) and r parameters between the measured and the predicted values from cross-validation. Starch, sugar, and total nitrogen content could be predicted, respectively, with 87%, 86%, and 93% confidence, whereas ash (minerals) could be predicted with 71%, and cellulose was not predictable (r = 0.31). The statistical parameters obtained for starch, sugars, and total nitrogen are of special interest for flour quality control. These constituents are quantitatively the most important In the chemical composition of flours, and starch content is negatively correlated with sugars and total nitrogen. NIRS is a low cost technique well adapted to the conditions in developing countries and can be used for the high-throughput screening of a great number of samples. Possible applications are discussed. © 2009 American Chemical Society.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know