Fragmentation mechanisms of product ions from protonated tripeptides
Journal of Physical Chemistry B, ISSN: 1520-6106, Vol: 108, Issue: 48, Page: 18743-18749
2004
- 40Citations
- 14Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Dissociation chemistries of the primary fragment ions from the tripeptides, GAG and AGG, were examined both experimentally and theoretically, and compared with those from GGG [El Aribi, H.; Rodriquez, C. F.; Almeida, D. R. P.; Ling, Y.; Mak, W. W.-N.; Hopkinson, A. C.; Siu, K. W. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 9229-9236], Findings in this study with GAG and AGG confirm and extend those in the earlier study on GGG. Fragmentation of the b to a ion from GAG and AGG is qualitatively similar to that from GGG; stabilization by the methyl group, however, results in generally lower energies for GAG. Fragmentation of the a ion from GAG produces both the a (protonated methanimine) and the internal iminium ion (protonated ethanimine). By contrast, fragmentation of the a ion from AGG produces only the a ion (protonated ethanimine). In GAG, formation of the internal iminium ion requires an intramolecular proton transfer in the proton-bridged complex after cleavage of CO, which is absent in AGG. The a ion from GAG is postulated to form via cleavage of the vibrationally excited proton-bridged complex prior to proton transfer, favored under higher collision-energy conditions. The critical transition state in the fragmentation of the b to a ion is best described as a complex between the a ion and a carbene. Although details differ, in both GAG and AGG, there is a proton transfer from the terminal amino group to the carbene carbon and a second proton transfer from the ring nitrogen back to the terminal amino group. Separation of the components then yields the a ion and a neutral oxazolone.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know