Quantitative assessment of pore blockage in supported catalysts: Comparing differential scanning calorimetry and physisorption
Journal of Physical Chemistry C, ISSN: 1932-7447, Vol: 116, Issue: 13, Page: 7480-7490
2012
- 11Citations
- 37Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Mesoporous materials are commonly used as supports for a guest phase, such as catalytically active transition metal nanoparticles. N physisorption at 77 K is the standard technique to characterize mesoporosity; however, it is not always suitable to assess pore blockage caused by the guest phase. Here we report on the qualitative and quantitative assessment of pore blockage comparing N physisorption with two alternative techniques: differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) of the freezing and melting of confined water and physisorption of Ar at 77 K. A set of well-defined model catalyst nanostructures with varying degrees of pore blockage was synthesized using ordered mesoporous supports and different nanoparticle sizes. Pore blockage was detected with sorption techniques by analyzing the delayed gas desorption. For the first time we report the analysis of nanoparticle induced constrictions with DSC by studying the delayed freezing of water in the constricted pores. Both DSC and argon sorption provided information which cannot be accessed by standard N physisorption. Therefore, both techniques are advocated for the analysis of complex porous structures. © 2012 American Chemical Society.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know