Comparison between different methods for measuring transpiration in potted apple trees
Biologia Plantarum, ISSN: 0006-3134, Vol: 46, Issue: 1, Page: 41-47
2003
- 31Citations
- 48Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Five different methods for measuring transpiration, which include gravimetric analysis (control), heat pulse velocity (HPV), time domain reflectometry (TDR), single leaf and whole plant infrared gas-exchange measurements, have been tested on two cultivars (Redcort and Empire) of young apple trees (Malus communis L.). The objective was to compare these methods and establish the most affordable one to be used in greenhouse conditions in order to determine and/or estimate the amount of water for an efficient irrigation management. Results obtained with TDR were particularly accurate and not statistically different with respect to the control (-4.2 %) and this was supported by the correlation coefficient (r = 0.94) found. The HPV method was sufficiently accurate and reliable for small stems, however, in our conditions this method generally underestimated the transpiration (-32.4 %). Single leaf and particularly whole plant infrared gas-exchange measurements suffered an overestimation of the transpiration with respect to the control.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0037235241&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/a:1022301931508; http://bp.ueb.cas.cz/doi/10.1023/A:1022301931508.html; http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/a%3A1022301931508; https://dx.doi.org/10.1023/a%3A1022301931508; http://bp.ueb.cas.cz/artkey/bpl-200301-0020_comparison-between-different-methods-for-measuring-transpiration-in-potted-apple-trees.php
Institute of Experimental Botany
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know