A probabilistic approach for estimating the separation between a pair of earthquakes directly from their coda waves
Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, ISSN: 2169-9356, Vol: 116, Issue: 4
2011
- 18Citations
- 57Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Coda wave interferometry (CWI) can be used to estimate the separation between a pair of earthquakes directly from the coda recorded at a single station. Existing CWI methodology leads to a single estimate of separation and provides no information on uncertainty. Here, the theory of coda wave interferometry is revisited and modifications introduced that extend the range of applicability by 50% (i.e., 300-450 m separation for 1-5 Hz filtered coda waves). Synthetic experiments suggest that coda wave separation estimates fluctuate around the actual separation and that they have an increased tendency to underestimate the actual separation as the distance between events increases. A Bayesian framework is used to build a probabilistic understanding of the coda wave constraints which accounts for both the fluctuations and bias. The resulting a posteriori function provides a conditional probability distribution of the actual separation given the coda wave constraints. It can be used in isolation, or in combination with other constraints such as travel times or geodetic data, and provides a method for combining data from multiple stations and events. Earthquakes on the Calaveras Fault, California, are used to demonstrate that CWI is relatively insensitive to the number of recording stations and leads to enhanced estimates of separation in situations where station geometry is unfavorable for traditional relative location techniques. Copyright © 2011 by the American Geophysical Union.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=79955060591&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2010jb007745; http://doi.wiley.com/10.1029/2010JB007745; http://www.agu.org/journals/jb/jb1104/2010JB007745/2010JB007745.pdf; https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1029%2F2010JB007745; https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1029/2010JB007745
Wiley-Blackwell
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know