Structure-activity studies at the rat tachykinin NK receptor: Effect of substitution at position 5 of neurokinin A
Journal of Peptide Research, ISSN: 1397-002X, Vol: 53, Issue: 3, Page: 337-342
1999
- 7Citations
- 4Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations7
- Citation Indexes7
- CrossRef7
- Captures4
- Readers4
Article Description
A series of analogues of neurokinin A(4-10) was synthesized using solid phase techniques with Chiron pins, and purified by HPLC. The potencies of 10 peptides with substitution at Ser were assessed at rat fundus NK2 receptors. In membrane binding studies with [I]- [Lys,Tyr(I),MeLeu, Nle]-NKA(4-10), all compounds except [Asp]NKA(4-10) showed reasonable affinity, and analogues with Lys and Arg substitutions were five-fold more potent than NKA(4-10). In functional studies, all peptides were able to contract the rat isolated fundus strips. Analogues with Phe, His and Ash substitutions were substantially weaker in functional than in binding studies, whereas there was an excellent correlation (r = 0.95) between binding and functional potency for the remaining seven peptides. [Phe]NKA(4-10) is in fact neurokinin B(4-10) and this residue may be critical in determining selectivity between NK2 and NK3 receptors. Analogues with a basic residue (Lys, Arg) at position 5 showed both increased affinity and functional potency, whereas the neutral [Asn]NKA(4-10) was equally as weak in contractile studies as the acidic [Asp]NKA(4-10). However, [Glu]NKA(4-10) and [Gln]NKA(4-10) were no different from NKA(4-10). Our results could indicate the presence of a negative charge on the NK2 receptor, close to position 5 of NKA. This would facilitate interaction with positively charged side chains and impede interaction with negatively charged side chains, particularly the inflexible side chain of aspartic acid. Thus, not only the charge, but also the length of the side chain of the residue at position 5, seems to be important for interaction with the rat NK2 receptor.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0032947986&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-3011.1999.00038.x; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10231723; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1034/j.1399-3011.1999.00038.x; https://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-3011.1999.00038.x; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1034/j.1399-3011.1999.00038.x
Wiley
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know