Effects of instruction modality and readback on accuracy in following navigation commands
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, ISSN: 1076-898X, Vol: 10, Issue: 4, Page: 245-257
2004
- 25Citations
- 26Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations25
- Citation Indexes25
- 25
- CrossRef16
- Captures26
- Readers26
- 26
Article Description
In 3 experiments, the authors simulated air traffic controllers giving pilots navigation instructions of various lengths. Participants either heard or read the instructions; repeated either all, a reduced form, or none of the instructions; and then followed them by clicking on the specified locations in a space represented by grids on a computer screen. Execution performance for visual presentation was worse than it was for auditory presentation on the longer messages. Repetition of the instructions generally lowered execution performance for longer messages, which required more output, especially with the visual modality, which required phonological recoding from visual input to spoken output. An advantage for reduced over full repetition for visual but not for auditory presentation was attributed to an enhanced visual scanning process.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=10944226963&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1076-898x.10.4.245; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15598122; http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/1076-898X.10.4.245; http://psycnet.apa.org/journals/xap/10/4/245.pdf; https://doi.apa.org/doi/10.1037/1076-898X.10.4.245; https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1076-898x.10.4.245; https://doi.apa.org:443/doiLanding?doi=10.1037/1076-898X.10.4.245
American Psychological Association (APA)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know