Effective, low-titer antibody protection against low-dose repeated mucosal SHIV challenge in macaques
Nature Medicine, ISSN: 1078-8956, Vol: 15, Issue: 8, Page: 951-954
2009
- 485Citations
- 227Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations485
- Citation Indexes484
- 484
- CrossRef447
- Patent Family Citations1
- 1
- Captures227
- Readers227
- 227
Article Description
Neutralizing antibodies are thought to be crucial for HIV vaccine protection, but studies in animal models suggest that high antibody concentrations are required. This is a major potential hurdle for vaccine design. However, these studies typically apply a large virus inoculum to ensure infection in control animals in single-challenge experiments. In contrast, most human infection via sexual encounter probably involves repeated exposures to much lower doses of virus. Therefore, animal studies may have provided an overestimate of the levels of antibodies required for protection in humans. We investigated whether plasma concentrations of antibody corresponding to relatively modest neutralization titers in vitro could protect macaques from repeated intravaginal exposure to low doses of a simian immunodeficiency virus-HIV chimera (SHIV) that uses the CC chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5) co-receptor. An effector function-deficient variant of the neutralizing antibody was also included. The results show that a substantially larger number of challenges is required to infect macaques treated with neutralizing antibody than control antibody-treated macaques, and support the notion that effector function may contribute to antibody protection. Overall, the results imply that lower amounts of antibody than previously considered protective may provide benefit in the context of typical human exposure to HIV-1.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=68349160853&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nm.1974; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19525965; https://www.nature.com/articles/nm.1974; https://www.zora.uzh.ch/id/eprint/30535; http://dx.doi.org/10.5167/uzh-30535; https://dx.doi.org/10.5167/uzh-30535; https://www.zora.uzh.ch/id/eprint/30535/; https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nm.1974; https://www.zora.uzh.ch/id/eprint/30535/10/Hessell.pdf; http://f1000.com/1164786#eval626605; http://www.nature.com/nm/journal/v15/n8/full/nm.1974.html; http://www.nature.com/doifinder/10.1038/nm.1974; https://ohsu.pure.elsevier.com/en/publications/dfa83ff9-6b2c-4ca7-8dc5-7e8c4c28cefd
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know