Erratum: In vivo imaging of neural activity (Nature Methods (2017) 14 (349-359) DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.4230)
Nature Methods, ISSN: 1548-7105, Vol: 14, Issue: 7, Page: 752-null
2017
- 5Citations
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations5
- Citation Indexes5
- Mentions1
- Blog Mentions1
- Blog1
Most Recent Blog
Nature Methods Contents: July 2017 Volume 14 pp 637 - 752
If you are unable to see the message below, click here to view. Advertisement High Titer Purified Lentivirus (Guaranteed >10^8 TU/ml) Fast turnaround70+ lentiviral vectorsAvailable
Correction Description
In the version of this article initially published, the formula for r in Box 1 incorrectly had a coefficient of 0.4. The correct coefficient is 1.4. The error has been corrected in the HTML and PDF versions of the article.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know