Comparative analysis of spasers, vertical-cavity surface-emitting lasers and surface-plasmon-emitting diodes
Nature Photonics, ISSN: 1749-4893, Vol: 8, Issue: 6, Page: 468-473
2014
- 123Citations
- 195Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Electrically pumped subwavelength plasmonic lasers (spasers) have attracted significant interest in recent years, but their properties are still not well understood, especially in comparison to the ubiquitous all-dielectric semiconductor microlasers (vertical-cavity surface-emitting lasers, VCSELs). Our theoretical analysis reveals that, from the fundamental physics point of view, a spaser does not differ from a semiconductor laser, as most of the energy is contained in the oscillations of electrons (free versus bound) and not in the electromagnetic field. At the same time, due to large losses in the metal, the technical characteristics of a spaser differ significantly from the VCSEL in that the spaser has at least three orders of magnitude higher threshold current density, four to five orders of magnitude wider linewidth, and a speed that is only a few times higher than in a VCSEL or an incoherent surface-plasmon- emitting diode. These results should assist researchers in making an informed choice of emitters for various particular optoelectronic applications. © 2014 Macmillan Publishers Limited.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know