Surgical treatment of aortic valve disease
Nature Reviews Cardiology, ISSN: 1759-5002, Vol: 10, Issue: 7, Page: 375-386
2013
- 35Citations
- 78Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations35
- Citation Indexes35
- 35
- CrossRef31
- Captures78
- Readers78
- 78
Review Description
The development of intraoperative transoesophageal echocardiography together with improved understanding of the functional anatomy of the aortic valve have allowed the design of several new conservative procedures, such as aortic valve-sparing operations, to treat patients with aortic root aneurysms or aortic insufficiency. The long-term results of these procedures have been excellent, and >90% of patients are free from reoperation on the aortic valve 10-15 years after surgery. Incompetent bicuspid aortic valves can also be repaired if the cusps are pliable and without calcification. Nevertheless, most patients with aortic valve disease, particularly those with aortic stenosis, need aortic valve replacement. Matching a patient to the type and size of prosthetic aortic valve is difficult, because of the limited durability of bioprosthetic valves and the need for lifelong anticoagulation with mechanical valves. Prosthesis-patient mismatch might not affect survival in most patients, but is a determinant of prognosis in patients with impaired ventricular function. Young adults with aortic stenosis, particularly women during childbearing years, can be treated with the Ross procedure. Finally, poor candidates for surgery who have aortic stenosis can now be treated with catheter-based aortic valve implantation but, in this article, the current status of aortic valve surgery is reviewed. © 2013 Macmillan Publishers Limited.
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know