PlumX Metrics
Embed PlumX Metrics

Randomized comparison of low dose cytarabine with or without glasdegib in patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia or high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome

Leukemia, ISSN: 1476-5551, Vol: 33, Issue: 2, Page: 379-389
2019
  • 403
    Citations
  • 0
    Usage
  • 290
    Captures
  • 5
    Mentions
  • 0
    Social Media
Metric Options:   Counts1 Year3 Year

Metrics Details

  • Citations
    403
    • Citation Indexes
      396
    • Policy Citations
      5
      • Policy Citation
        5
    • Patent Family Citations
      2
      • Patent Families
        2
  • Captures
    290
  • Mentions
    5
    • News Mentions
      5
      • News
        5

Most Recent News

AML Patient Case: 66-Year-Old Man Presents With Progressive Fatigue and Exercise Intolerance

Part 1 - Case Presentation Brian A. Jonas, MD, PhD, FACP, presents the case of patient “A.B.” to fellow faculty members Daniel A. Pollyea, MD,

Article Description

Glasdegib is a Hedgehog pathway inhibitor. This phase II, randomized, open-label, multicenter study (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01546038) evaluated the efficacy of glasdegib plus low-dose cytarabine (LDAC) in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome unsuitable for intensive chemotherapy. Glasdegib 100 mg (oral, QD) was administered continuously in 28-day cycles; LDAC 20 mg (subcutaneous, BID) was administered for 10 per 28 days. Patients (stratified by cytogenetic risk) were randomized (2:1) to receive glasdegib/LDAC or LDAC. The primary endpoint was overall survival. Eighty-eight and 44 patients were randomized to glasdegib/LDAC and LDAC, respectively. Median (80% confidence interval [CI]) overall survival was 8.8 (6.9–9.9) months with glasdegib/LDAC and 4.9 (3.5–6.0) months with LDAC (hazard ratio, 0.51; 80% CI, 0.39–0.67, P = 0.0004). Fifteen (17.0%) and 1 (2.3%) patients in the glasdegib/LDAC and LDAC arms, respectively, achieved complete remission (P < 0.05). Nonhematologic grade 3/4 all-causality adverse events included pneumonia (16.7%) and fatigue (14.3%) with glasdegib/LDAC and pneumonia (14.6%) with LDAC. Clinical efficacy was evident across patients with diverse mutational profiles. Glasdegib plus LDAC has a favorable benefit–risk profile and may be a promising option for AML patients unsuitable for intensive chemotherapy.

Bibliographic Details

Cortes, Jorge E.; Heidel, Florian H.; Hellmann, Andrzej; Fiedler, Walter; Smith, B. Douglas; Robak, Tadeusz; Montesinos, Pau; Pollyea, Daniel A.; DesJardins, Pierre; Ottmann, Oliver; Ma, Weidong Wendy; Shaik, M. Naveed; Laird, A. Douglas; Zeremski, Mirjana; O’Connell, Ashleigh; Chan, Geoffrey; Heuser, Michael

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Medicine; Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology

Provide Feedback

Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know