The point-of-care Bilistick method has very short turn-around-time and high accuracy at lower cutoff levels to predict laboratory-measured TSB
Pediatric Research, ISSN: 1530-0447, Vol: 86, Issue: 2, Page: 216-220
2019
- 10Citations
- 23Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations10
- Citation Indexes10
- 10
- CrossRef7
- Captures23
- Readers23
- 23
Article Description
Background: This study aimed to determine the accuracy of a point-of-care Bilistick method for measuring total serum bilirubin (TSB) and its turn-around-time (TAT) against hospital laboratory methods. Methods: This prospective study was carried out on 561 term-gestation jaundiced neonates in two Malaysian hospitals. Venous blood sample was collected from each neonate for contemporary measurement of TSB by hospital laboratories and Bilistick. TAT was the time interval between specimen collection and TSB result reported by each method. Results: The mean laboratory-measured TSB was 194.85 (±2.844) µmol/L and Bilistick TSB was 169.37 (±2.706) µmol/L. Pearson’s correlation coefficient was: r = 0.901 (p < 0.001). The mean difference of [laboratory TSB− Bilistick TBS] was 26.48 (±29.41) µmol/L. The Bland–Altman plots show that the 95% limits of agreement (−31.1577, 84.11772) contain 94.7% (=531/561) of the difference in TSB readings. Bilistick has a 99% accuracy and 100% sensitivity to predict laboratory TSB levels of ≥80 µmol/L and ≥360 µmol/L at lower Bilistick TSB levels of ≥55 and ≥315 µmol/L, respectively. TAT of Bilistick TSB (2.0 min) was significantly shorter than TAT (105 min) of laboratory TSB (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Bilistick has shorter TAT. The accuracy and sensitivity of Bilistick TSB for predicting laboratory TSB is high at lower cutoff levels.
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know