Mechanisms and treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension
Nature Reviews Cardiology, ISSN: 1759-5010, Vol: 22, Issue: 2, Page: 105-120
2025
- 5Citations
- 3Usage
- 43Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations5
- Citation Indexes5
- CrossRef4
- Usage3
- Abstract Views3
- Captures43
- Readers43
- 43
- Mentions1
- References1
- Wikipedia1
Review Description
Substantial progress has been made in the management of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) in the past 25 years, but the disease remains life-limiting. Established therapies for PAH are mostly limited to symptomatic relief by correcting the imbalance of vasoactive factors. The tyrosine kinase inhibitor imatinib, the first predominantly non-vasodilatory drug to be tested in patients with PAH, improved exercise capacity and pulmonary haemodynamics compared with placebo but at the expense of adverse events such as subdural haematoma. Given that administration by inhalation might reduce the risk of systemic adverse effects, inhaled formulations of tyrosine kinase inhibitors are currently in clinical development. Other novel therapeutic approaches for PAH include suppression of activin receptor type IIA signalling with sotatercept, which has shown substantial efficacy in clinical trials and was approved for use in the USA in 2024, but the long-term safety of the drug remains unclear. Future advances in the management of PAH will focus on right ventricular function and involve deep phenotyping and the development of a personalized medicine approach. In this Review, we summarize the mechanisms underlying PAH, provide an overview of available PAH therapies and their limitations, describe the development of newer, predominantly non-vasodilatory drugs that are currently being tested in phase II or III clinical trials, and discuss future directions for PAH research.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85200588219&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41569-024-01064-4; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39112561; https://www.nature.com/articles/s41569-024-01064-4; https://hsrc.himmelfarb.gwu.edu/gwhpubs/5504; https://hsrc.himmelfarb.gwu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=6503&context=gwhpubs; https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41569-024-01064-4
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know