Modulating plant growth–metabolism coordination for sustainable agriculture
Nature, ISSN: 1476-4687, Vol: 560, Issue: 7720, Page: 595-600
2018
- 488Citations
- 627Captures
- 7Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations488
- Citation Indexes486
- 486
- CrossRef447
- Patent Family Citations2
- Patent Families2
- Captures627
- Readers627
- 627
- Mentions7
- News Mentions6
- News6
- Blog Mentions1
- Blog1
Most Recent News
Una forma de conseguir que los cultivos de la revolución verde sean productivos sin necesitar tanto nitrógeno
Un equipo de investigadores de la Academia de Ciencias de China, la Academia de Ciencias Agrícolas y Forestales de China y la Universidad de Oxford
Article Description
Enhancing global food security by increasing the productivity of green revolution varieties of cereals risks increasing the collateral environmental damage produced by inorganic nitrogen fertilizers. Improvements in the efficiency of nitrogen use of crops are therefore essential; however, they require an in-depth understanding of the co-regulatory mechanisms that integrate growth, nitrogen assimilation and carbon fixation. Here we show that the balanced opposing activities and physical interactions of the rice GROWTH-REGULATING FACTOR 4 (GRF4) transcription factor and the growth inhibitor DELLA confer homeostatic co-regulation of growth and the metabolism of carbon and nitrogen. GRF4 promotes and integrates nitrogen assimilation, carbon fixation and growth, whereas DELLA inhibits these processes. As a consequence, the accumulation of DELLA that is characteristic of green revolution varieties confers not only yield-enhancing dwarfism, but also reduces the efficiency of nitrogen use. However, the nitrogen-use efficiency of green revolution varieties and grain yield are increased by tipping the GRF4–DELLA balance towards increased GRF4 abundance. Modulation of plant growth and metabolic co-regulation thus enables novel breeding strategies for future sustainable food security and a new green revolution.
Bibliographic Details
10.1038/s41586-018-0415-5; 10.3410/f.733813956.793550052; 10.3410/f.733813956.793550213; 10.3410/f.733813956.793550953; 10.3410/f.733813956.793553247
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85052337158&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0415-5; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30111841; https://facultyopinions.com/prime/733813956#eval793550052; http://dx.doi.org/10.3410/f.733813956.793550052; https://facultyopinions.com/prime/733813956#eval793550213; http://dx.doi.org/10.3410/f.733813956.793550213; https://facultyopinions.com/prime/733813956#eval793550953; http://dx.doi.org/10.3410/f.733813956.793550953; https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-018-0415-5; https://facultyopinions.com/prime/733813956#eval793553247; http://dx.doi.org/10.3410/f.733813956.793553247; https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0415-5; https://f1000.com/prime/733813956#eval793553247; https://f1000.com/prime/733813956#eval793550213; https://f1000.com/prime/733813956#eval793550052; https://f1000.com/prime/733813956#eval793550953
Faculty Opinions Ltd
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know