Grating-based phase-contrast and dark-field computed tomography: A single-shot method
Scientific Reports, ISSN: 2045-2322, Vol: 7, Issue: 1, Page: 7476
2017
- 40Citations
- 61Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations40
- Citation Indexes38
- 38
- CrossRef21
- Patent Family Citations2
- 2
- Captures61
- Readers61
- 61
Article Description
Grating-based X-ray interferometry offers vast potential for imaging materials and tissues that are not easily visualised using conventional X-ray imaging. Tomographic reconstruction based on X-ray interferometric data provides not only access to the attenuation coefficient of an object, but also the refractive index and information about ultra-small-angle scattering. This improved functionality comes at the cost of longer measurement times because existing projection-based signal extraction algorithms require not only a single measurement per projection angle but several with precise grating movements in between. This obstacle hinders the adaptation of grating-based interferometry into a continuously rotating gantry. Several solutions to this problem have been proposed but all suffer from major drawbacks. We present results using an iterative reconstruction algorithm working directly on the interferograms. The suggested direct approach enables improved image quality, since interpolations and unnecessary assumptions about the object are circumvented. Our results demonstrate that it is possible to successfully reconstruct the linear attenuation coefficient, the refractive index and the linear diffusion coefficient, which is a measure related to ultra-small-angle scattering, using a single measurement per projection angle and without any grating movements. This is a milestone for future clinical implementation of grating-based phase-contrast and dark-field contrast X-ray computed tomography.
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know