Energy-efficient waveform for electrical stimulation of the cochlear nerve
Scientific Reports, ISSN: 2045-2322, Vol: 7, Issue: 1, Page: 13582
2017
- 19Citations
- 57Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations19
- Citation Indexes19
- 19
- CrossRef14
- Captures57
- Readers57
- 57
Article Description
The cochlear implant (CI) is the most successful neural prosthesis, restoring the sensation of sound in people with severe-to-profound hearing loss by electrically stimulating the cochlear nerve. Existing CIs have an external, visible unit, and an internal, surgically-placed unit. There are significant challenges associated with the external unit, as it has limited utility and CI users often report a social stigma associated with prosthesis visibility. A fully-implantable CI (FICI) would address these issues. However, the volume constraint imposed on the FICI requires less power consumption compared to today's CI. Because neural stimulation by CI electrodes accounts for up to 90% of power consumption, reduction in stimulation power will result directly in CI power savings. To determine an energy-efficient waveform for cochlear nerve stimulation, we used a genetic algorithm approach, incorporating a computational model of a single mammalian myelinated cochlear nerve fiber coupled to a stimulator-electrode-tissue interface. The algorithm's prediction was tested in vivo in human CI subjects. We find that implementation of a non-rectangular biphasic neural stimulation waveform may result in up to 25% charge savings and energy savings within the comfortable range of hearing for CI users. The alternative waveform may enable future development of a FICI.
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know