Effect of intake manifold geometry on cylinder-to-cylinder variation and tumble enhancement in gasoline direct injection engine
Scientific Reports, ISSN: 2045-2322, Vol: 12, Issue: 1, Page: 19862
2022
- 3Citations
- 19Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
In this study, the effect of intake manifold geometry on cylinder-to-cylinder variation was investigated considering the volumetric efficiency, early tumble development, turbulent kinetic energy, and spark plug gap velocity using computational fluid dynamic program, CONVERGE v2.4. The simulation model was validated based on the PIV experiment in the cylinder and Mie-scattering experiment of intake manifold, and its results agreed well with the experiment results. The curved intake manifold and straight manifold were compared. As a result, it was advantageous for cylinder-to-cylinder variation in the straight intake manifold compared to the curved intake manifold in perspective of volumetric efficiency which were a maximum deviation of 1.7% in curved manifold and 0.6% in straight manifold. And the straight manifold had an effect of the strengthening the in-cylinder flow, so that the turbulent kinetic energy near TDC was increased to maximum 11% than curved manifold. And considering the effect of manifold curve radius on in-cylinder flow intensity in straight manifold, with increasing engine speed, the in-cylinder flow intensified during compression with decreasing the intake manifold radius due to the short distance between manifold inlet and port. Especially at 2000 rpm, the tumble ratio increased 55% at intake manifold radius of 10 cm than of 7 cm at bTDC 280 deg. Therefore, for the purpose of enhancing the in-cylinder flow near spark plug timing, shortened distance between intake manifold inlet and port and increasing the manifold radius is required.
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know