Diagnosing skin cancer using social spider optimization (SSO) and error correcting output codes (ECOC) with weighted hamming distance
Scientific Reports, ISSN: 2045-2322, Vol: 14, Issue: 1, Page: 22997
2024
- 10Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures10
- Readers10
- 10
Article Description
Skin cancer is a common disease resulting from genetic defects, and early detection is critical to improve treatment outcomes. Diagnostic programs that use computer aid especially those that use supervised learning are very useful in early diagnosis of skin cancer. This research therefore presents a new approach that integrates optimization methods with supervised learning to improve skin cancer diagnosis using machine vision approach. The presented method is initiated by data pre-processing that involves the removal of unnecessary data. Then, to segment the images, a combination of K-means clustering and social spider optimization technique is employed. The region of interest is then extracted from the segmented image and from this region a convolutional neural network extracts the significant features. To enhance the classification performance as compared with the standard classifiers, this research introduces a new concept of error correcting output codes coupled with a weighted Hamming distance in the group of gamma classifiers. The ability of the proposed approach in segmentation of skin lesions and classifying them was tested using samples from the ISIC-2017 and ISIC-2016 databases. The introduced method obtained state-of-the-art accuracy on both datasets (ISIC-2016: 97.10%, ISIC-2017: 95.17%). In particularly, the accuracy of the introduced approach for both these databases is at least 1.17% higher than the compared methods. This proves the high performance of the suggested method based on the usage of the convolutional neural networks for feature extraction and gamma classifiers with error correcting output codes for classification in skin cancer detection.
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know