Environmental regulation, coal de-capacity, and PM2.5 in China
Scientific Reports, ISSN: 2045-2322, Vol: 15, Issue: 1, Page: 7785
2025
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
This paper examines how the removal of excess coal production capacity has affected the air quality in China. A coal de-capacity policy, including a reduction in coal, downscaling of the pollution in mines, and strict regulation of coal production, was implemented in 2016. However, until now studies have paid little attention to the effects of coal de-capacity on air pollution. Using panel data from 294 cities covering from 2014 to 2020, we employed a continuous Differences-in-Differences (DID) method to show that coal de-capacity significantly reduces Particulate Matter 2.5 (PM2.5). This finding is robust to using alternative indicators, Instruments Variable (IV) and the Propensity Score Matching with Differences-in-Differences (PSM-DID) method. The heterogeneity analysis suggests that the coal de-capacity policy has a larger effect on eastern, northern cities, and those with higher initial PM2.5 and a heavier industrial base. The PM2.5 deduction is caused by cleaning coal production under the coal de-capacity. These findings provide new knowledge on the environmental benefits of coal de-capacity and demonstrate the environmental benefits of Chinese supply-side reformation.
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know