Multimodal Anatomy of the Human Forniceal Commissure
Research Square, ISSN: 2399-3642, Vol: 5, Issue: 1, Page: 742
2022
- 2Citations
- 18Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations2
- Citation Indexes2
- Captures18
- Readers18
- 18
Article Description
Anatomical studies investigating the forniceal commissure have mainly been performed in non-human primates. However, ambiguity surrounds the existence, morphology, and functionality of this structure in the human brain. We investigated the morphology of the human forniceal commissure by including advanced in vivo tractography, ex vivo fiber dissection, and histology. A whole-brain tractography from 7T data of 180 participants was produced, each fornix dissected, and fiber percentage maps calculated. In nine human brains, we performed stepwise multidirectional Klinger dissection under the operating microscope. For histological analysis, multiplanar serial floating sections of six specimens were obtained. Virtual fiber dissection did not identify interhemispheric connections between the crura fornicis. Klingler dissection demonstrated a thin soft-tissue membrane spanning between the left and right crus fornicis, but no commissural fibers. These findings were corroborated by the multiplanar histological analysis with myelin staining that visualized delicate cruciform fibers extending between the crura fornicis, which were enclosed by connective tissue. The human forniceal commissure appears much more delicate than previously described and presented in anatomical textbooks. This finding is consistent with the phylogenetic trend of a striking reduction of the forniceal commissure in non-human primates compared to non-primate mammals and might have functional implications in clinical neurology.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85182394820&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s42003-022-03692-3; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85134740759&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35879431; https://www.nature.com/articles/s42003-022-03692-3; https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s42003-022-03692-3
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know