The association between abnormal microRNA-10b expression and cancer risk: A meta-analysis
Scientific Reports, ISSN: 2045-2322, Vol: 4, Issue: 1, Page: 7498
2014
- 14Citations
- 29Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations14
- Citation Indexes14
- 14
- CrossRef9
- Captures29
- Readers29
- 29
Article Description
Several studies have investigated the association between abnormal microRNA-10b expression and the risk of various developing cancers, but the results are inconsistent. We searched all publications addressing the level of microRNA-10b expression in cancer cases and noncancerous controls (Accessed: August 2014). Thirty-six studies on 14 types of cancer were included. Among them, 25 studies were subjected to the meta-analysis with a vote-counting strategy, 13 studies were estimated using odds ratio (OR) and diagnostic accuracy, and 2 studies were assessed by both methods. It was found that vestibular schwannomas ranked first among the reported cancer types with up-regulated microRNA-10b expression; melanoma ranked first among the reported cancer types with down-regulated microRNA-10b expression; while breast cancer and hepatocellular cancer presented inconsistent microRNA-10b regulation. Of 13 included studies calculated for OR and diagnostic accuracy, it was shown that high-expression of microRNA-10b could be significantly associated with cancer risk (OR=32.80, 95% CI: 11.90-90.37, P<0.0001), and the area under the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve for microRNA-10b high-expression in the diagnosis of cancer is 0.81, which suggested that high-expression of microRNA-10b can predict worse outcomes in some types of cancer and the regular monitoring of miR-10b expression might be useful in the clinical practice.
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know