Chapter 11: Machine Learning and Scoring Functions (SFs) for Molecular Drug Discovery: Prediction and Characterisation of Druggable Drugs and Targets
RSC Theoretical and Computational Chemistry Series, ISSN: 2041-319X, Vol: 2020-January, Issue: 17, Page: 251-279
2020
- 8Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures8
- Readers8
Book Chapter Description
Predicting druggability and prioritising disease-modifying targets is critical in drug discovery. In this chapter, we describe the testing of a druggability rule based on 9 molecular parameters, which uses cutpoints for each molecular parameter and targets based on mixture clustering discriminant analysis. We demonstrate that principal component constructs and score functions of violations can be used to identify the hidden pattern of druggable molecules and disease targets. Random Forest and Artificial Neural Network rules to classify the high-score target from the low-score molecular violators, based both on molecular parameters and the principal component constructs, have confirmed the value of logD's inclusion in the scoring function. Our scoring functions of counts of violations and novel principal component analytic molecular and target-based constructs partitioned chemospace well, identifying both good and poor druggable molecules and targets. Viable molecules and targets were located in both the beyond Rule of 5 and expanded Rule of 5 regions. Random Forest and Artificial Neural Networks showed different variable importance profiles, with Artificial Neural Networks models performing better than Random Forests. The most important molecular descriptors that influence classification, by the Random Forest methods, were MW, NATOM, logD, and PSA. The optimal Artificial Neural Networks target models indicated that PSA and logD were more important than the traditional parameter MW. Overall, our score 4 partitions using logD were optimal at classification as shown in all Random Forests and Artificial Neural Networks analyses.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85094567789&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/9781839160233-00251; https://books.rsc.org/books/monograph/1902/chapter-abstract/2495354/; https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/9781839160233-00251; https://books.rsc.org/books/edited-volume/1902/chapter-abstract/2495354/Machine-Learning-and-Scoring-Functions-SFs-for
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know