Gaining efficiency by parallel quantification and identification of iTRAQ-labeled peptides using HCD and decision tree guided CID/ETD on an LTQ Orbitrap
Analyst, ISSN: 1364-5528, Vol: 135, Issue: 10, Page: 2643-2652
2010
- 12Citations
- 27Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations12
- Citation Indexes12
- CrossRef12
- 12
- Captures27
- Readers27
- 27
Article Description
Isobaric stable isotope labeling of peptides using iTRAQ is an important method for MS based quantitative proteomics. Traditionally, quantitative analysis of iTRAQ labeled peptides has been confined to beam-type instruments because of the weak detection capabilities of ion traps for low mass ions. Recent technical advances in fragmentation techniques on linear ion traps and the hybrid linear ion trap-orbitrap allow circumventing this limitation. Namely, PQD and HCD facilitate iTRAQ analysis on these instrument types. Here we report a method for iTRAQ-based relative quantification on the ETD enabled LTQ Orbitrap XL, which is based on parallel peptide quantification and peptide identification. iTRAQ reporter ion generation is performed by HCD, while CID and ETD provide peptide identification data in parallel in the LTQ ion trap. This approach circumvents problems accompanying iTRAQ reporter ion generation with ETD and allows quantitative, decision tree-based CID/ETD experiments. Furthermore, the use of HCD solely for iTRAQ reporter ion read out significantly reduces the number of ions needed to obtain informative spectra, which significantly reduces the analysis time. Finally, we show that integration of this method, both with existing CID and ETD methods as well as with existing iTRAQ data analysis workflows, is simple to realize. By applying our approach to the analysis of the synapse proteome from human brain biopsies, we demonstrate that it outperforms a latest generation MALDI TOF/TOF instrument, with improvements in both peptide and protein identification and quantification. Conclusively, our work shows how HCD, CID and ETD can be beneficially combined to enable iTRAQ-based quantification on an ETD-enabled LTQ Orbitrap XL. © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2010.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=77956851736&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c0an00267d; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20714520; https://xlink.rsc.org/?DOI=c0an00267d; https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c0an00267d; https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2010/an/c0an00267d
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know