Integrated photocatalytic micropillar nanoreactor electrospray ionization chip for mimicking phase i metabolic reactions
Lab on a Chip, ISSN: 1473-0189, Vol: 11, Issue: 8, Page: 1470-1476
2011
- 25Citations
- 28Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations25
- Citation Indexes25
- CrossRef25
- 24
- Captures28
- Readers28
- 28
Article Description
We developed a nanoreactor chip based system to mimic phase I metabolic reactions of small organic compounds. The microchip, made of silicon, has an anatase-phase titanium dioxide (TiO) nanolayer coating for photocatalysis and an integrated electrospray ionization (ESI) tip for direct mass spectrometric (MS) analysis. This novel method for mimicking phase I metabolic reactions uses an on-chip TiO-nanolayer and an external UV-lamp to induce photocatalyzed chemical reactions of drug compounds in aqueous solutions. The reactions of selected test compounds (verapamil, metoprolol, propranolol, lidocaine, 2-acetamidofluorene, and S-methylthiopurine) produced mostly the same main products as phase I metabolic reactions induced by human liver microsomes, rat hepatocytes, or cytochrome P enzymes, showing hydroxylation, dehydrogenation, and dealkylations as the main photocatalytic reactions. With this method it is possible to detect reactive and toxic products (mimicking reactive metabolites) due to the absence of biological matrices and an immediate analysis. The method used is sensitive: only 20-40 pmol (1-10 ng) of a substrate was needed for the experiment, thus it provides an inexpensive method for screening possible metabolites of new drug candidates. Due to small dimensions of the microchip, diffusion lengths are suitable for the high reaction rates, thus providing a rapid analysis as the reaction products can be detected and identified directly after the photoinduced reactions have occurred. The method shows a similar performance to that of electrochemistry, a commonly used technique for mimicking phase I metabolism. © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2011.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=79953195567&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c0lc00689k; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21394381; https://xlink.rsc.org/?DOI=c0lc00689k; https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c0lc00689k; https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2011/lc/c0lc00689k
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know